Censorship in Canada

by | Oct 3, 2002

The University of Toronto Objectivist Club is having an event this Sunday entitled “The Moral Case for Supporting Israel”. The club ordered from the Ayn Rand Institute 350 complimentary copies of a pamphlet entitled “In Moral Defense of Israel”. (PDF). Yesterday morning, I received a Notice of Detention from the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency […]

The University of Toronto Objectivist Club is having an event this Sunday entitled “The Moral Case for Supporting Israel”. The club ordered from the Ayn Rand Institute 350 complimentary copies of a pamphlet entitled “In Moral Defense of Israel”. (PDF).

Yesterday morning, I received a Notice of Detention from the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency regarding the pamphlet delivery. The letter stated that “The following goods [the pamphlets] have been detained for a determination of tariff classification as they may constitute obscenity or hate propaganda. You will be notified in writing of the decision.” The letter acknowledges that the material was properly declared in accordance with government regulations. The letter did not give a date as to when we can expect to hear back about the status of the material. The only phone number given was the Prohibited Importation Unit’s number, which is (905) 625-7942.

The government has confiscated material that we were expecting for our upcoming event. It is virtually impossible that we will be able to get it in time. In addition, it is possible (although not yet confirmed) that they actually opened the sealed box without permission to look at the pamphlets.

Should we not receive our material, this is an egregious example of censorship, and it should not be tolerated passively. Even if we do receive it ultimately, the damage will be done in that we will not be able to hand it out to hundreds of people who would have been enlightened by its content. The pamphlet’s content makes important arguments, arguments required to defend the state of Israel and ultimately, the Western world itself. If this is “hate speech”, then we might as well surrender ourselves to the terrorists immediately.

I encourage you to review the pamphlet on the Ayn Rand Institute’s website, to send letters to as many newspaper editors and writers as possible, to attend our event this Sunday (info. is available at www.uoftobjectivistclub.com) and to inform anyone that may find this situation relevant. Feel free to forward this letter.

Sincerely,
Ray Girn, President, University of Toronto Objectivist Club

Update from Ray: “I did receive a (somewhat cryptic) message from the customs official saying that the material had been reviewed, was deemed admissable, and will be now mailed out. (I still haven’t found out whether they opened the box, but if they did, it was done without my permission or ARI’s permission).”

Ray Girn is CEO of LePort Schools.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Have a comment?

Post your response in our Capitalism Community on X.

Related articles

Left Discovers Free Speech (“For Me, Not Thee”)

Left Discovers Free Speech (“For Me, Not Thee”)

Leftists who have been on the forefront in denying free speech rights to those deemed politically incorrect have now begun to champion the First Amendment in defense of those who advocate the killing of Jews.

Right Approach to the Pro-Hamas Protests

Right Approach to the Pro-Hamas Protests

The First Amendment gives anti-Israel protesters the right to be immoral.  It gives them the right to lie and to reflect antisemitic bigotry. The First Amendment, though, also gives us the right, indeed the responsibility, to call out this immorality, mendacity, and double standard.

The High Stakes in the Legal Battle for Free Speech

The High Stakes in the Legal Battle for Free Speech

The decision reaffirmed what the Supreme Court called the “bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment” in 1989: “that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.”

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest